Tag Archives: $JProof

Is Stew Peter’s $JProof being manipulated by AI holders?

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

This is the third article I have written regarding the problems with Stew Peter’s meme coin, Jproof. The first was a general warning against investing in cryptocoins, of which meme coins are those which are not Bitcoin. The second was the observation that one investor so outpaces the others in skill, that he has made nearly all of the net profits of all Jproof holders.

In this third report, I want to warn all who might someday think of investing in meme coins, which end up on the platform Meteora of the fact that a large number of AI programs appear to be controlling the market, to the advantage of the owners of the platform, not the owners of the meme coin.

Here, let me explain it.  If you got to jproof.ai and scroll down you find this display, when you click the word, “Traders”.  The first image is of the largest of the top holders, and the second image show the smallest of the top holders.

This is the list of all the major holders of the Jproof meme coin. Wanting to know who these are, I clicked the entry for each in the EXP column. This in turn reveals whether the account is a human being or a “System Program”.

The top account owns about 821 million jproof meme coins of the total 971 million.  I assume this is the initial investors’ account, or perhaps it is simply and only Stew Peter’s account. He has promised the public that he will never sell his jproof coins. And from what I can see from the ledgers, he has kept that promise and made no transactions after launching the coin publicly.

The other major holders, which are all system programs own 110 million coins. And the general public owns about 40 million coins.

And this information should worry the general public. Because if the general public owns 3 times less coins than “System Programs”, the “System Programs” have the ability to control the price of the coin.

Now, ethically speaking, I can understand that there has to be someone to sell the publicly offered tokens to the public, since Stew Peters is not selling his tokens. And I can understand that the platform which is offering the services of marketing and accounting would own some tokens in its own name, while managing the sale and purchase of the tokens to and by the public holders, who number about 3800.

But some of those “System Programs” I have found bought the meme coin when it was selling for 1/100th of a penny and are selling it at higher prices. Indeed, one of these “System programs” bought at low price and sold when the meme coin reached 14 cents.

And that is very troubling. Because, the “System programs” own so much of the jproof coin, that if they can enter the market and participate alongside human investors, that if their actions are not strictly limited and their participation held within bounds, the human investors could be too easily defrauded.

That there is even such participation violates the ethics of a crypto market in my opinion, because human investors could never compete with AI controlled accounts. And there is a conflict of interest if any of these “system programs” are in fact owned and operated by the accounting authorities, liquidity authorities or platform authorities which govern and oversee the market of jproof coins.

Ethically speaking, that is, only HUMANs should be allowed to transact meme coins. That guarantees that the decisions on investing are made in a context which is equitable to all investors. Thus whether you buy or sell, you should only be buying from or selling to another human investor.

If AI programs owned by those with conflicts of interests are trading this meme coin, it is highly likely that the coin cannot but FAIL, because the system programs hold all the cards, as it were, both in numbers of coins and ability to intervene to deflate the price.  For when you buy any of these coins, at any price, a system program which bought them at 1/100th of a penny can intervene and sell a quantity to reduce the price of the coin below what you paid for it. Thus effectively pumping your investment out into the pockets of whoever is running these “system programs”.

I would urge all investors into meme coins to ask the platform trading them for a full disclosure, on all topics, espcially on what “system programs” are involved, what their actions are, and what are the limitations placed upon them to guarantee the integrity of the market and the equitable (fair) conditions for human investors. Short of that, the platform is even less secure than a roulette table in a casino owned by the Mafia.

In my opinion, an ethical platform will not allow entities who have the fiduciary responsibility to run the market or offer the coin for sale from owning any coins and engaging in any sales or purchases, and only charge a fee for purchase and sale. Moreover, ALL transactions, enacted by “system programs” should be clearly marked with special colors or flashing font, so that humans reading the ledgers, can see who are humans and who are not, and what is the purpose of the systems interventions (sale to public, purchase from public, fees, commissions, service costs etc..)

The $Jproof offering, however, seems to have given 11% of the entire offering into the hands of those with conflicts of interest.

See my disclosures on my first report, which I intent to apply to all my reports on $Jproof.

UPDATE: Just two months ago, Solana, the company which launched this meme coin, was involved in a ethical scandal, called a “rug pull” as is explained in this Wikipedia article below, from which I extract this “money quote”:

Several economic experts pointed out that those affected had advanced knowledge of digital currencies since, to access said cryptocurrency, it was necessary to have a wallet in Solana, a blockchain known for its low security and reduced operating costs. In addition, the purchase had to be made with the SOL cryptocurrency, which limited participation to people with prior knowledge of the ecosystem.[30]

A “rug pull” is when the human investors who launched the meme coin sell our their holdings reducing the value of the coin to much less and thus ruining the investments of all other holders. This is NOT what I have feared about $Jproof, I should make clear. What is happening with $Jproof coin regards the agencies of these “system programs”.

From the mountain top of all this information, I remain very concerned that the platforms used to launch and market memecoins are in fact designed to be able to milk the reputation of real persons, such as Javier Milei and Stew Peter’s, so as to rob the savings of their fans, in a way that has a legal protection for the perpetrators. There may be very legal and complete disclosures, but when the human buyer has to compete with other actors who have 1000s of times more coin than themselves, and who acquired those coins for less capital than all human actors in the market, I cannot see how gross robbery does not result in the end, by necessity, even if some lawyer could argue that the “investors should have known the risks”. Fans who trust Stew Peters deserve better.

Single Trader has pumped out all the net profits on $JProof in 77 trades?

Editor’s Note: This is an update on Stew Peter’s meme coin, JProof. From what appears on jproof.ai, under the list for top traders who have made a profit, as seen above in the screen shot, a single trader, whose Crypto-Address begins with D4K has purchased $11,800 worth of Jproof in 8 transactions and sold them in 77 transactions, making a profit of $258,700. But the entire jproof trades, as seen in the right bar of the scree shot, show total purchases worth 3.7 million dollars and total sales of 3.4 million, with a difference of only $300,000 more or less. — That seems to mean, if I am reading the charts correctly, that a single person has pumped out of JPROOF a sum equivalent to all the net profits so far made on the coin, counting profit in real hard cash and not paper gains. — This does not mean that no one else made profits — as you can see from the screen shot, they have — rather, it means that his level of profiteering is truly significant, since there are more than 2800 persons who have purchased this meme coin.

Net profits means all profits minus all losses.

Correct me if I am wrong, you readers, who know more than I do about crypto spreadsheets.

Click the image to see the screen shot at full resolution, if you are using a tablet or pc to read this article. — The screen shot was taken at about 10:45 PM. New York City time, on April 18, 2025.

Again, as I say, I am no expert, but it seems to be that something is up, because normally profits are more evenly distributed. However, it does not necessarily mean that he is an inside trader, only that he has much more skill and experience than all the others; which is why I strongly encourage everyone never to get involved in cryptocurrency speculation. — See my previous reports and my disclaimers, HERE.

I am covering this story, not to promote the meme coin, but to educate my readers into its dangers and frauds.

Stew Peter’s launches $JProof Crypto Coin, but beware

News, Critiques and Warnings by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I am not posting this news to promote Stew Peter’s new crypto-coin, but to warn my readers, as is my habit since 2013, of those things which are not what they appear.

ATTENTION: I am not a qualified financial adviser and declare that nothing I write here should be used to make any decision with your financial portfolio or monies, but that you should seek professional advice before making any such decisions. I write only on the basis of my own personal knowledge gathered over the years in non-academic settings. So what follows are only my personal opinions.

First, I never counsel or advise anyone to purchase or use cryptocurrencies, because they are not real things and have no fixed value and are exchangeables through which the unwary are often caused to lose vast amounts of money.

Cryptocurrency launches, indeed, as far as I know, are nearly always financial failures except for a few savvy and unscrupulous persons (see here for more information). These persons are not always the launchers of the coins either, this must be made clear.

First, the very nature of a nearly finite number of valueless-in-themselves digital currency coins is open to the worst kind of chichancery known as a ponzi scheme.  A ponzi scheme is where publicity is used to sell something through a network of individuals with promises of riches, but where the actual monies accumulated by the sale from one individual to another are not stored in anything of fixed value, such that in the end, those left holding the item own worthless things.

In Cryptocoin launches this happens thus: a small group of investors purchases some or all of the cryptocoin, and then negotiates its sale to  the public through some middle-man agency. Publicity is then used to hype the coin, and the hype psychologically convinces the unwary investor — who has little protection in law in most jurisdictions — to purchase the worthless coins with real money. The increased hype causes increased demand, which causes the coin to rise in value, sometimes to extraordinary heights in short periods of time.

Here is where the savvy but unscrupulous agents enter in, and as I said, they are not always the group of initial  investors. Let us calls them SBUAs for short, Savy But Unscrupulous AgentS.

The SBUAs purchase large quantities of the coin when it is nearly worthless. They do this through multiple accounts or through conspiracies hosted on other websites in private chats. They push the hype of the coin and watch the price rise. Once it has risen to a very high amount, they begin to sell their holdings in increments to balance with the rising purchases by unwary persons.

The result is that money is transferred from those buying the new Coin without much advice and independently, to those SBUAs who are involved in a conspiracy to hype the Coin. Human nature being what it is, some persons fearing loss, will sell before making much profit and others will sell when they see they are losing. These sales are watched and exploited so that the SBUAs can make quick profits.

So as much money goes into buying the Coin so much goes out to those SBUAs selling it.

We can see this metric happening live on Stew Peter’s $JProof Coin, as the screen shots below show.

In fact, one investor, is constantly purchasing low and selling high, and pumping 10s of thousands of dollars into an online Casino account, where the monies seem to be being laundered to unknown destinations. Indeed, when a cryptocoin is launched on a platform like Solera, anyone can come buy and reap the profits off the unsuspecting.

Now obviously, I would strongly urge you NOT to purchase this Coin, because unknowingly or not, Stew gave it a name ($JProof == Jew Proof) which guarantees that if you buy it you will create a legal presumption of being an “antisemite” and find it very difficult to find a lawyer or judge to hear any case you might have to make to defend your rights or seek damages from being defrauded. Not to mention that the name would incite Jewish extremists or Zionists to prey on the Christians owning it to suck out their life savings.

But from the lists of who is making lots of money off selling this Coin high after buying it low, and who is losing money, you can see what I have said being proven:

Here are those who might be SBUAs:

Who have made $21 to 74 thousand USD in a week or less, as of 8:30 AM Rome Time, Good Friday. And here are the big losers. As you can see, a lot of folks are losing their shirts, as we say in America, while a few are profiting on the losses of many others.

Finally, the manner of this new Cryptocoin launch is fraught with other problems which can cause you to lose money. First, it is offered on the Solera platform, so you first have to purchase Solera coins before you purchase $JProof coins, and you lose in the exchange or variation of that other coin.

Secondly, this coin is being launched by Stew Peters, who has promised never to sell the coins he owns. This is very problematic, because as soon as he sells one coin, he can be sued for fraud by the U. S. Securities and Exchange commission for making fraudulent claims. Also, he seems to be hyping the coin, and since a cryptocoin is a form of security, making statements about future value of the security is a crime in the U.S.A., though I am by no means a legal expert, you can find the regulations here:

Finally, I am by no means implying that Stew Peters is a SBUAs. SBUAs can infiltrate the sale of any cryptocurrency. But I think he has done a great disservice to his viewers by giving it a name which is guaranteed to brand everyone who buys it as an “antisemite”, “nazi”, “right-winger” and having launched it on the Solera platform, which ironically, is owned by Jews!

The Solera platform, which has been faulted by the SEC before, does not seem to be transacting the sales in an entirely equitable manner, because, inasmuch as I have seen, when a buyer buys X amount, the price rises by N in some cases, and 3 x N in other cases. Contrariwise, though you would expect that successive buys would cause the price to always increase, I have seen at least one buyer get a lower price on his buy even though it followed another buy. That makes no sense. Also, the website listing the prices seems to have a lag in the transactions, with numbers of buyers and sellers changing much ahead of the prices reported for each transaction, resulting in a lack of reliability in the information presented. This means that anyone with a higher speed access to the transaction data and a computer trading app could easily take advantage of all the investors in this new cryptocoin.

Those using Solera should read their information well to see just how Solera calculates the price offered and sold, because in a small thing like this, even a small clipping of the price could result in large profits for Solera and losses for all their clients.

And as it stands at 8:45 AM, Rome Time, April 18, 2025, it appears that the biggest holder (Stew Peters?) has made 10s of millions of dollars profit, on paper, from Peters’ many viewers who are taking his advice to buy it. In my book, that does not appear to be ethical. But since Stew himself decries this sort of thing in his opening video, which you can watch if you click the top image on this post, I am stunned that it might be him.

Nevertheless, I fear that in a short time, whether days, or weeks or months, the end result will be that those who trusted in Stew will have their life savings stolen by SBUAs and that his public reputation will be damaged beyond repair. Then the lawsuits will begin as his enemies solicit his past supporters to take legal action. And then all the good he has done will come to naught, but perhaps a jail sentence.

DISCLOSURE: I do not own nor intend to purchase any of these $JPROOF coins and have no financial or personal ties with Stew Peters. Neither he nor anyone, who to my knowledge owns or would own this coin, has solicited me to write this article, an advertisement for which I happened to see watching a totally unrelated topic video on his channel, without any expectation of seeing such an advertisement. I chose to write this article solely on my own initiative after examining the offering and watching what was happening to those who invested in it. I have written solely as a public service, and what I wrote I believe to be true, but if I am wrong in anything, please let me know in the comments below.