Tag Archives: Pope Gregory VII

News

A Meditation for Catholics at Rome: August 10, 2026 A. D..

1 Comment

Translated from the original Italian at ChiesaRomana.info

From the perspective of eternity, the choice between supporting Leo XIV or Hildebrand—and vice versa—must be weighed against the most authoritative testimony of history and the Communion of Saints: indeed, there is not a single Pope, Saint, or Blessed of the Church who supports Leo XIV—who was elected in violation of four rules set forth in Pope John Paul II’s Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis.

In contrast, regarding Hildebrand—elected in perfect conformity with the provisions of Pope Nicholas II’s Bull In Nomine Domini, as prescribed for the extraordinary circumstance in which the Roman Church must oppose the dishonest and illegitimate election of an antipope (such as Prevost’s undoubtedly is)—the Church of Rome boasts the testimony and signatures of 77 bishops, 4 popes, 4 saints, and 2 blesseds.

The choice is clear: Christ calls us to choose the Communion of Saints and to strive to be numbered among them. Consequently, we cannot tolerate or endorse Robert Prevost’s claim to be our Bishop and Pontiff, for such a choice leads not to Heaven but to Hell—the most terrible fate of all: excommunication from the Communion of Saints.

Here are the names of the 77 bishops, 4 popes, 4 saints, and 2 blesseds who signed Nicholas II’s Bull at the Lateran Council of April 1059, taken from the critical edition of this Papal Bull, published in Detlev Jasper’s, Das Papstwahldekret von 1059, (Thorbecke, 1986):

I, Nicholas, Bishop of the Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church, have signed this Decree promulgated by Us, as written above.

I, Bonifacio, by the grace of God, (Cardinal) Bishop of Albano, have undersigned (this).
I, Humbert (de Moyenmoutier, Cardinal Bishop) of the holy Church of Santa Rufina, have undersigned (this).
I, (St.) Pietro (Damiano), (Cardinal Bishop) of the Church of Ostia, have undersigned (this).
I, Pietro, (Cardinal) Bishop of the Church of Tusculum, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni (II, Cardinal) Bishop of the Church of Porto, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni, Cardinal (Priest) of the Title of Saint Mark, have undersigned (this).
I, Leone, Cardinal (Priest) of the Title of Saint (Lawrence in) Damaso, have undersigned (this).
I, Vivo, Cardinal (Priest) of the Title of Santa Maria in Trastevere, have undersigned (this).
I, (Bl.) Desiderio, Cardinal (Priest) of Santa Cecilia (and Abbot of Monte Cassino), have undersigned (this).1
Mancius, (Cardinal) Deacon,
Crescenzio, (Cardinal) Deacon,
Amanzio, (Cardinal) Deacon, have undersigned (this).

(Saint) (Hildebrand, the monk and subdeacon and all the other (clergy) of the Roman Church undersigned this).2

I, Guido (de Velate), Archbishop (of Milan), have undersigned (this).
I, Dominico (IV Marango), Patriarch of Grado, have undersigned (this).
I, Hugues, Bishop of Besançon, have undersigned (this).
I, HIldebrand, Bishop of Capua, have undersigned (this).
I, Ouldarico, Archbishop of Benevento, have undersigned (this).
I, (St.) Alfano, Archbishop of Salerno, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni, Bishop of Sabina, have undersigned (this).3
I, Giovanni, Bishop of Tivoli, have undersigned (this).
I, Rolando, Bishop of Sutri, have undersigned (this).
I, Gerhard, Bishop and Abbot of Saint Paul’s (outside the Walls), have undersigned (this).
I, Leone, Bishop of Gaeta, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni (IV), Bishop  of Terracina, have undersigned (this).
I, Pandolfo, Bishop of Avezzano, have undersigned (this).
I, Attone (Berardi dei Marsi), Bishop of Chieti, have undersigned (this).
I, Domenico O. S. B, Bishop of Sulmonna-Valva (and Abbot of San Clemente di Casauria), have undersigned (this).
I, Palombo O. S. B., Bishop of Sora, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni (II), Bishop of Penne, have undersigned (this).
I, Pietro (I), Bishop of Cività Castellana, have undersigned (this).
I, Ludovico, Bishp of Nocera, have undersigned (this).
I, Ermanno, Bishop of Cività del Castello, have undersigned (this).
I, Enrico, Bishop of Spoleto, have undersigned (this).
I, (Bl.) Mainardo, Bishop of Urbino, have undersigned (this).
I, Goffredo, Bishop of Perugia, have undersigned (this).
I, Aganon, Bishop of Autun (France), have undersigned (this).
I, Uldarico, Bishop of Fermo, have undersigned (this).
(I, Bernardo II, Bishop of Ascoli Piceno, have undersigned this).
(I, Ugo I, Bishop of Camerino, have undersigned this)
I, Guglielmo, Bishpo of Numana, have undersigned (this).
I, Trasmondo, Bishop of Fiesole, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni, Bishop of Sovana, have undersigned (this).
I, Arnaldo dei Offredi, Bishop of Arezzo, have undersigned (this).4
I, Marino, Bishop of Fondi, have undersigned (this).
I, Adalberto, Bishop of Narni, have undersigned (this).
I, Bernardo, Bishop of Sant’Agata dei Goti, have undersigned (this).
I, Teuzone, Bishop of Orvieto, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni, Bishop of Chiusi, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni, Bishop of Siena, have undersigned (this).
I, Guido, Bishop of Volterra, have undersigned (this).
(I, Pietro, Bishop of Volturara Appula, have undersigned this).
I, Benedetto, Bishop of Sessa Aurunca, have undersigned (this).
I,  Azzo (degli Atti), Bishop of Foligno, have undersigned (this).
I, Pietro (II), Bishop of Teramo, have undersigned (this).
I, Gerardo, Bishop of Rusellae, have undersigned (this).
I, Anselmo (I), Bishop of Lucca, have undersigned (this).5
I, Pietro (I), Bishop of Pesaro, have undersigned (this).
I, Andolfo, Bishop of Montefeltro, have undersigned (this).
I, (St.) Rodolfo, (O. S. B. Cam.,) Bishop of Gubbio, have undersigned (this).
I, Teodosio, Bishop of Senigallia, have undersigned (this).
I, Arduino, Bishop of Todi, have undersigned (this).
I, Arduino, Bishop of Fano, have undersigned (this).
I, Arnolfo (I), Bishop of Cosenza, have undersigned (this).
I, Stefano (the Norman), Bishop of Troia, have undersigned (this).
I, Benigno (Benedetto), Bishop of Fossombrone, have undersigned (this).
I, Ugo (I), Bishop of Cagli, have undersigned (this).
I, Gerardo, Bishop of Rieti, have undersigned (this).
I, Gisilberto, Bishop of Tuscania, have undersigned (this).
I, Agino, Bishop of Assisi, have undersigned (this).
I, Ingone, Bishop of Bagnoregio, have undersigned (this).
I, Tegrimo, Bishop of Massa Marittima, have undersigned (this).
I, Oberto (Pevere), Bishop of Genoa, have undersigned (this).
I, Adeodato, Bishop of Montecorvino, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni, Bishop of Trevi, have undersigned (this).
I, Giovanni (IV), Bishop of Alatri, have undersigned (this).
I, Placido, Bishop of Veroli, have undersigned (this).
I, Erasmo, Bishop of Segni, have undersigned (this).
I, Arichis, Bishop of Alife, have undersigned (this).
I, Cuniberto, Bishop of Torino, have undersigned (this).
I, Opizo, Bishop of Bobbio, have undersigned (this).
I, Benzone, Bishop of Alba, have undersigned (this).
I, Ottone, Bishop of Novara, have undersigned (this).
I, Enrico, Bishop of Ivrea, have undersigned (this).
I, Guglielmo, Bishop of Asti, have undersigned (this).

—————–

FOONOTES

Source of Latin Text: Das Papstwahldekret von 1059. Echte Fassung, in: Jasper, Detlef. Das Pastwahldekret von 1059: Überlieferung und Textgestalt. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke, 1986, pp. 98-119. — The readings within () have been taken occasionally from the Imperial version.

1  The future, Pope Victor III.
2  The future, Pope Gregory VII.  His signature was recorded in the Imperial version of this Bull, compiled some 30 years afterwards, with the dignity of “subdeacon” rather than “archdeacon” to slight his reputation, for having contested the Emperor’s claim to have authority to invest Bishops.
2  This Giovanni, Bishop of Sabina, was formerly a Cardinal, but having usurpsed the Papacy under Pope Benedict IX, as anti-Pope Sylvester III, he was deposed at the First Council of Sutri in 1046, in the presence of the German King Henry III. That he is not listed among the Cardinals, in the above list, seems to indicate that he was striped of the dignity of the Cardinalate, but allowed to keep his functions as Bishop.
3  This identification is based on reading “Rosphredus … Attestensis” as misreading of the signature for (A)r(naldus) Ospredus .. Arietensis”, confirming this with the lists for the Bishops of Arezzo by this name, who attended this Council, but whose name is not otherwise found in the above lists.
4  The future, Pope Alexander II.

News

The Church of Rome must now return to Sutri!

8 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction Française

In the days before Christmas in the year of Our Lord One Thousand and Forty-Six, the King of the Germans, Henry III came to Sutri, Italy, in the environs of Viterbo to put in order the Roman Church.

As he descended with his armed knights into Italy, he sent emissaries to Pope Gregory VI to summon a provincial council there, to settle once and for all who was the real pope.

For in the year 1046, there were 3 claimants to the Papacy. One whom had been juridically elected, but sold the papacy and resigned, but then returned to claim it again. This was Pope Benedict IX, a teenager known for debauching himself with both sexes. Then, there was an errant Bishop who came to Rome and paid the clergy to acclaim him, so that they would have a decent man rather than this young perp. That was Pope Sylvester III. And then there was the Cardinal John Gratian, a wealthy man, who disgusted at the immoral depravity of the teenager Pope, offered to buy the papacy from him, so that he could be free to run off and marry his girlfriend. He accepted. This third claimant was Pope Gregory VI.

I have spoken about the facts before here, in my article The Doors to Sutri are opening, back in 2020, where I cited the Polish ecclesiastical historian, Prof. Grzegorz Kucharczyk, who pointed out the historical importance of Sutri for the Church of today. See all my articles on the Synod of Sutri, here.

Actually there were two Synods of Sutri, one in 1046, which I have just described, and another in 1061, for the reformation of the discipline of the clergy of the Roman Church. So obscure is this history, that even at Sutri, the first Council has been forgotten. It just runs contrary to too many theologians ideals of an exaggerated papal authority: the thought that the Church can depose Popes.

Sutri today is still in the ecclesiastical province of Rome. But it belongs to the Diocese of Civita Castellana. Sutri is also important in the story of the Papal States, on account of the fact that it was the first city put under the jurisdiction of the Roman Pontiff in 728 A. D., by the King of the Lombards, Luitprand, in the Donation of Sutri.

Because of the important historical value of this Synod, held 977 years ago, I made a long pilgrimage to Sutri this evening to attend mass in the Church of Saint Sylvester, where in 1046 3 popes were deposed in the presence of the the German King, Henry, at whose consent only one was canonically elected.

Sanctuary of the Cathedral of Sutri, Italy, as seen at 5:40 PM, Tuesday, October 3, 2023.

The Synod was not held in the Cathedral of the City (shown in the feature image above and here to the right), whose large dimensions inspired the imagination to conceive of rows and rows of nobles, knights, Cardinals, Bishops, clergy, monks, faithful, all gathered in the most solemn array, to witness the most unique event in all Church history, the deposition of 3 popes on the same day.

No, it was held in the Church of Saint Sylvester, which is no bigger than a chapel in a Seminary. (This was probably done so that the combined body warmth of all those attending would heat the building on those cold December days of 1046.) And in that room from December 23-24, there stood not only Henry III, who would be crowned Emperor of the Romans on Christmas Day at Rome, but also Saint Hildebrand (the future great Pope Gregory VII, savior of the medieval Papacy), who was at that time still the acolyte of Pope Gregory VI, and Bl. Daufer, who would ascend the Apostolic Throne as Pope Victor III only twenty years later.

The events of 1046 show us that despite the scandals and tribulations of history, Our Lord remains in charge of His Church. After Mass He showed this by inspiring the priest to expose Him in the Most Blessed Sacrament at the center of the Altar, to receive the praise, love and above all adoration of the Faithful.

In the image above, Saint Anne teaches Our Lady to read from Sacred Scripture, while Saint Peter prays for Pope Saint Sylvester, Martyr. Our Lord remains with us, and His Saints are at His back! This is where we should be: upholding His unchanging will for Holy Mother Church.

And this is why we must all now insist, as I have recently urged, that a provincial council be called. Read that article to see what can do, to make it happen!

Church History, Ecclesiology

The Dictatus of Pope St. Gregory VII

3 Comments

 

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In the present hour of darkness and confusion, it behooves all to turn their gaze back to the sound and eternal judgement of the saintly popes of old, of which one of the greatest was Pope Saint Gregory VIII, in life called Hildebrand, who single-handedly saved the Catholic Church from the filthy and avaricious hands of godless men who usurped the right to name Bishops, Abbots and distribute the benefices of the Church to their friends and political allies.

During his papacy, there was entered into the official register of papal laws, the Dictatus papae, a collection of solemn truths which regard the Catholic Faith on the Papal Primacy and the Roman Church. See here for the Latin text and a copy of one of the most ancient manuscripts containing it.

Due to the relative obscurity of this magisterial text, I share with you now the text in both Latin and my English translation. (The Video above includes the Latin text) I pray that it might be for your enlightenment and for the confirmation of your faith in these troubled times, when true doctrine is being so obscured.

Dictatus Papae

Number Latin English translation
I Quod Romana ecclesia a solo Domino sit fundata. That the Roman Church has been founded by the Lord alone.
II Quod solus Romanus pontifex iure dicatur universalis. That the Roman Pontiff alone is called “universal” by right.
III Quod ille solus possit deponere episcopos vel reconciliare. That He alone can depose and/or reconcile Bishops.
IV Quod legatus eius omnibus episcopis presit in concilio etiam inferioris gradus et adversus eos sententiam depositionis possit dare. That His legate takes precedence in council to all bishops even when he is of inferior grade and can give a sentence of deposition against them.
V Quod absentes papa possit deponere. That the Pope can depose those absent.
VI Quod cum excommunicatis ab illo inter cetera nec in eadem domo debemus manere. That among other things we neither ought to remain in the same house of the one excommunicated by him.
VII Quod illi soli licet pro temporis necessitate novas leges condere, novas plebes congregare, de canonica abatiam facere et e contra, divitem episcopatum dividere et inopes unire. That for him alone is it licit, according to the necessity of time to establish new laws, to welcome new peoples, to make new abbacies of canonical right and, contrariwise, to divide rich bishoprics and unite needy ones.
VIII Quod solus possit uti imperialibus insigniis. That he alone can use the imperial insignia.
IX Quod solius pape pedes omnes principes deosculentur. That all princes are to kiss the feet of the pope alone.
X Quod illius solius nomen in ecclesiis recitetur. That the name of him alone is to be recited in the churches (in the Canon of the Mass).
XI Quod hoc unicum est nomen in mundo. That this (his name as Pope) is the only one in the world.
XII Quod illi liceat imperatores deponere. That for him it is licit to depose emperors.
XIII Quod illi liceat de sede ad sedem necessitate cogente episcopos transmutare. That for him it is licit when driven by necessity to transfer bishops from see to see.
XIV Quod de omni ecclesia quocunque voluerit clericum valeat ordinare. That he validly ordains any cleric from every church wheresoever.
XV Quod ab illo ordinatus alii eclesie preesse potest, sed non militare; et quod ab aliquo episcopo non debet superiorem gradum accipere. That the one ordained by him can take charge of any church, but not serve as a soldier; and that he ought not accept a superior grade from any bishop.
XVI Quod nulla synodus absque precepto eius debet generalis vocari. That no synod without his precept ought to be called “general”.
XVII Quod nullum capitulum nullusque liber canonicus habeatur absque illius auctoritate. That no chapter be held and no canonical book be recognized without his authority.
XVIII Quod sententia illius a nullo debeat retractari et ipse omnium solus retractare possit. That his sentence ought to be retracted by no one and that he alone can retract that of all.
XIX Quod a nemine ipse iudicare debeat. That he himself be judged by no one.
XX Quo nullus audeat condemnare apostolicam sedem apellantem. That no one dare condemn the one appealing to the Apostolic See.
XXI Quod maiores cause cuiscunque ecclesie ad eam referri debeant. That the greater cases of every church whatsoever ought to be referred to Her.
XXII Quod Romana ecclesia nunquam erravit nec imperpetuum scriptura testante errabit. That the Roman Church has never erred nor shall ever err in perpetuity, as Scripture testifies.
XXIII Quod Romanus pontifex, si canonice fuerit ordinatus, meritis beati Petri indubitanter efficitur sanctus testante sancto Ennodio Papiensi episcopo ei multis sanctis patribus faventibus, sicut in decretis beati Symachi pape continetur. That the Roman Pontiff, if he has been canonically ordained, is undoubtedly made holy by the merits of Blessed Peter, according to the testimony of Saint Ennodius, Bishop of Pavia, with many holy Fathers favoring him, just as is contained in the decrees of Blessed Pope Symachus.
XXIV Quod illius precepto et licentia subiectis liceat accusare. That by his precept and license it is licit for his subjects to bring accusations.
XXV Quod absque synodali conventu possit episcopus deponere et reconciliare. That he can depose and reconcile bishops without the convening of a synod.
XXVI Quod catholicus non habeatur, qui non concordat Romane ecclesie. That one is not to be held to be Catholic, who is not in agreement with the Roman Church.
XXVII Quod a fidelitate iniquorum subiectos potest absolvere. That he can absolve the subjects of the iniquitous from fealty.