Tag Archives: Pope Leo XIV renounces

News

Vatican Official Annuario denies Prevost all the Offices of St. Peter

3 Comments

+ + +

As for the antipope Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who claimed the papacy as Pope Francis, Robert Francis Riggitano Martinez Prevost has ordered the publication of the official Annuario of the Vatican City State to omit applying to him the titles of:

Vicar of Christ

Successor of the Prince of the Apostles

Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church

Patriarch of the West

Primate of Italy

Archbishop and Metropolitan of the Roman Province

Sovereign of the Vatican City State

Servant of the Servants of God

+ + +

Click the above image to read the original story in full, in Italian, or use your browser’s inherent translator to read it in your own language.

Moreover, it is indeed curious and revealing, that the one title that Prevost is given is “Universal Pastor of the Church”, a title expressly rejected by past popes when it was claimed by the Patriarch of Constantinople, since no one Bishop has the care of souls of all Christians, except Jesus Christ. But, in the Church of the Antichrist, there will be one “pastor”, the Antichrist, who will set himself up in the house of God above all that is God. For this reason, Prevost is being spiritual consistent, as can be seen by all who still have eyes to see.

Andrea Cionci explains more about this, here, explaining what it means, in Italian, when one says, “titoli storici”.

As a historical note: in the Rogitus for the election of Pope Hildebrand you can see what titles were claimed, openly, clearly, simply, directly. Thus, if there be anyone who says Hildebrand does not hold these offices, when Prevost clearly does not claim them, they should be asked to explain the logic which brings them to say such things.

Indeed, seeing that Prevost no longer prosecutes — in the legal sense of “claims” — these titles, there remains only one candidate with a legal claim, according to Papal Law, for each and all of them: Hildebrand.

And this is what FromRome.Info told you back in December of 2025. Like always, you learn the truth here first.

So if you want a Pope, you have a pope.

And if you don’t want a pope, you can have your “Universal Pastor” in the full and total spirit of the Antichrist, just as Pope Nicholas II said in his Bull, in 1059 A. D., in n. 4 of that document.

Indeed, it is the ultimate diabolic deception of our age, that so many Catholics today render the obedience they should show only to legitimate Successors of Saint Peter, to a man invalidly elected who does not even claim to be the Successor of Saint Peter any more! While refusing to render it to the man who not only was legitimately elected, but claims to be all those things which the Popes prior to Vatican II claimed to be!

A HISTORICAL – CANONICAL NOTE

Back in the spring of 2020, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, controlling the Vatican under the name of Pope Francis, had his own Annuario Pontificio also list these same titles as “titoli storici”.  FromRome.Info reported on that on April 2, of that year, HERE.

The import of that, however, is different, since in the Annuario of 2014, Bergoglio claimed these titles. So when he had his Annuario change them 6 years later it was seen as an ideological statement. But Prevost, who controls the Vatican now under the name of Pope Leo XIV, published in this year of 2026 A. D., his first Annuario, which does NOT claim these titles.

Canonically, then, this is the confession by Prevost that he never intended to be the Roman Pontiff in the theological and historic-juridical sense. And this declassification of his claim as such is a legal maneuver to deny that he is committing the crime of being an antipope. Or in other words, he is like the thief who steals a car but does not register it as his own property, but keeps it in the name of the previous owner, to hide the legal trail of his theft of the property.

But the agenda of both men is the same: a one world Church, divorced from Christ, which apes the Catholic Church and yet imprisons all Catholics in the appearance of the true Church.  This new Church is obvious the Church of the Antichrist. And if you follow Pope Leo XIV you are a member of it, unwittingly or not!

News

Will Prevost renounce his claim to the Papacy? Here’s the Latin Text to do it aright

7 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

If anything is certain since Feb. 11, 2013, it’s that at the Vatican those who are in power don’t know how to say or do anything aright in Latin and in accord with ecclesiastical law. I know this because I found 40+ errors in the Latin of Pope Benedict XVI’s Declaration, which he read aloud on that day, and at least 6 canonical errors in the text that cause it to have no juridical effect whatsoever.

Most recently, the Conclave of May, 2025, had no valid juridical result, also, because the Cardinals seemingly read the erroneous Italian translation of Universi Dominici Gregis, n. 33, rather than the Latin.

So, since THE juridical problem at the Vatican now requires that Robert Cardinal Francis Riggitano Prevost-Martinez has to abdicate his fake claim to the Papacy, I do not have confidence that anyone in the Vatican could prepare a valid Latin text for him to read, to effect that.

So, without further ado, I will propose a text which is juridically valid, if he reads it out loud in the presence of the College of Cardinals, and preferably before cameras to provide an incontrovertible testimony to the same.

Ego, Robertus Franciscus Prevost, hucusque mihi “Leo XIV” nominando, muneri Romani Ponteficis renuntio plene et integre, ex cognoscentia honesta quod electio mei invalida fuit per praecepti transgressionem Cardinalium electorum numeri maximi, in numero triginta tres Constitutionis Apostolicae, Universi Dominici Gregis, quod praeceptum in vigore remanet semper, sine omni dispensationis possibilitate, dum Sedes Apostolica vacet secundum numerum quartum illius Constitutionis.

My Translation:

I, Robert Francis Prevost, heretofore naming myself, “Leo XIV”, fully and entirely renounce the munus of the Roman Pontiff, on account of an honest recognition that my election was invalid, on account of the transgression of the precept regarding the maximum number of Cardinal electors, in n. 33 of the Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis, which precept remains in force at all times while the Apostolic See is vacant, according to n. 4 of the same Constitution, without any possibility of dispensation.

It’s without a doubt cheeky of me to suggest such a text, but while I have the freedom to be such, at FromRome.Info, I will do so for the sake of my readers.