Tag Archives: SSPX

News

The Lord of Hosts has spoken, Hildebrand is His Vicar on Earth

16 Comments

Two historical events, each of which is undeniable and each of which is significant have occurred in recent days, proving that Hildebrand is the Vicar of Christ on Earth.

The first is that at the moment of Consecration of the Most Blessed Sacrament, by the Bishops of the Society of Saint Pius X, on July 1, 2026, the Lord sent clouds over the place and it began to pour rain, preventing for a long time the distribution of communion to the Faithful, present. In fact, only after the recitation of the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin, were the laity able to receive.

The second is that Robert Prevost, who claims to be Leo XIV, while visiting Lampedusa, had his zucchetto removed from his head, by the Lord who sent a wind which took that authentic symbol of His Vicar on Earth, away from him who has no legal claim to wear it.

And:

These two events can only be explained by this: that someone else is the true vicar of Christ, and that the SSPX could have obtained papal mandate from him, to have Christ’s blessing, but failed to act honestly (Cf. the Agenda for Hildebrand’s Pontificate, here).

We will see more of this until Hildebrand is enthroned as Roman Pontiff, since the Holy Ghost will not remain silent nor let His people be deceived.

WHO IS HILDEBRAND, THE POPE ELECT?

It has been more than 6 months since the Catholics of Rome used their right, granted to them by Saint Peter the Apostle, according to the teaching of Pope Nicholas II, to elect Hildebrand, during the sedevacante which resulted from the failed, illegal election of Robert Prevost in May of last year. (For more about that see Hilebrands “Urbi et Orbi” for Christmas and the FAQ file which contains replies to all the most major questions, including who Hildebrand is, and basic facts about him).

Since that time, no one on earth has brought any canonical argument against the validity of his election. All they can do is hurl insults and innuendos against him or the former editor of FromRome.Info.

This is because, without a doubt, some of those who are attacking are paid or blackmailed agents of foreign intelligence agencies, who realize how great an existential threat to the New World Order is the possibility of a truly Catholic and legally valid Roman Pontiff, whom they did not select and who is not a brother in the Lodge as they are.

For that reason, they NEED as an absolute necessity to know who Hildebrand is, that is, to know his nationality and civil name and present location, because they actually do intend to murder him, first by public calumny and finally but shooting him dead or poisoning him.

Mindful, that our war here is not only against the principalities and powers in the heavens, as Saint Paul teaches, but also against their evil spawn, the Freemasons of our age, Br. Bugnolo advised the pope elect to not reveal publicly his identity, since that is the easiest and safest way to he can be protected without the expense of thousands of dollars in security services, body guards, and the rent of a secure isolated compound. This security measure will last until he is consecrated a Bishop. Thus, it is only a temporary measure for very practical reasons.

There are many trolls on social media, who would have you think that it is crazier to accept a Roman Pontiff whose civil name you do not know, than it is to reveal his name now.  But these individuals are psychotic, that is, divorced from the reality in which we live: wherein a criminal gang of sodomites and heretics, hand selected and chosen by U.S. intelligence agencies and with the connivance of many other nations, has seized total control not only of the Vatican but of nearly every other Catholic diocese and institution, by putting into power men who are spies, intelligence agents, or blackmailed persons, so as to totally control a false narrative, that everything is O.K. in the Church, or that the only solution is destroying Her from within through heresy and schisms.

As Catholics we already know that there have been many Popes in the history of the Catholic Church, whose civil names and biographies we know nothing or very little, as to who they were before their election, not to mention afterwards. All we know are their regnal names, and even some of these are in dispute (e. g. Pope Fabian, in some sources is called “Pope Flavian”).  No Catholic in their right mind has ever said, that since he does not know who these popes were, that he does not accept them as true Popes.  Rather, the entire Church has held that he is the true pope, who is the first man validly elected, regardless of who he was in life or what his name is.

An example of this is Pope John II.

Every Catholic accepts him as the true pope.  We know from history that he was not called, “John”, but “Ioannes”, since the Catholics of Rome in those days spoke Latin. We know from historical studies, that he reigned from the year of our Lord January 2, 533 to May 8, 535 A. D.. But John was not his name in life. He was the first to change his name and take a regnal name.

The vast majority of Roman Pontiffs since have done the same. Only in more recent centuries do we know the name of these men, before they were elected, with absolute certainty.

FromRome.Info won’t tell you the “real” name of Pope John II, though we know it. And in this we do not sin, because it is a lesson in history and common sense, as well as humility, that we have presented his case.

Finally, it is obvious that to the Bishops who will consecrate Hildebrand, he will make his name and identity known, and that to all Bishops who seriously inquire about him, they can request a meeting with him, via his Secretary of State, at SedesApostolica.Info.  This security measure is in effect only for non-Bishops and Bishops who, as the persons above, want to know who he is, but refuse to accept him, because they reject all papal law as the principle of determining who is the true pope or not; finding that not having a pope, and/or, not having a Catholic pope who wants to clean up the Church, is better to their liking.

The stakes here are life and death. Anyone with common sense and a little knowledge of what is going on in the world right now, understands this. For those who want to be in juridical, hierarchical and spiritual communion with Jesus Christ, it is enough to know the true popes reignal name, Hildebrand. For, as scripture says, in Psalm 69, verses 30 to 36, according to the Latin of the Clementine Vulgate:

Laudabo nomen Dei cum cantico ; et magnificabo eum in laude ; et placebit Deo super vitulum novellum, cornua producentem et ungulas. Videant pauperes, et lætentur ; quærite Deum, et vivet anima vestra, quoniam exaudivit pauperes Dominus, et vinctos suos non despexit. Laudent illum cæli et terra ; mare, et omnia reptilia in eis. Quoniam Deus salvam faciet Sion, et ædificabuntur civitates Juda, et inhabitabunt ibi, et hæreditate acquirent eam. Et semen servorum ejus possidebit eam ; et qui diligunt nomen ejus habitabunt in ea.

Which in English, we render thus:

I will praise the Name of God with a canticle; and I will magnify Him in praise; and it shall please God more than a new calf, sprouting horns and hooves.  Let the poor see and be glad! Seek God, and let your soul live! since the Lord has heard the poor, and has not despised His prisoners.  Let the Heavens and Earth praise Him! the sea, and all the moving things in them.  Since the Lord shall save Zion, and they shall build the cities of Judah, and shall dwel in them, and they shall acquire her as an inheritance.  And the seed of His servants shall possess her; and those who have chosen to love His Name shall dwell in her.

These things were said prophetically of the Catholic Faithful of future ages who accept Jesus Christ and submit to His rule in the Church, under His true and legitimate vicars on earth.

Finally, though it is needless to say for clergy who understand Church law and have a conscience, that for those priests and deacons who need faculties, and who accept Hildebrand as the pope elect, they can contact his Secretary of State and make an application for this purpose. Presently, the Holy Father is especially asking for the help of clergy, Bishops and Priests, to serve the Faithful at Rome, so that they may have all the Sacraments of Christ in communion with Him.

Church History, Faith, Social Media Reviews

SSPX, a bastion of Orthodoxy or of Freemasonry?

Leave a comment

+ + +

The strange behavior of the SSPX since the reign of Pope Benedict XVI raises serious questions about what that organization’s true goals and motivations are. In this essay, a series of facts and documents and observations are made, among which are the very words of Archbishop Lefebvre,  which are and should be deeply concerning to all true Catholics in the world, who want to preserve and restore the Catholic Faith received from the hands of the Apostles and the faithful popes before the Second Vatican Council.

News

SSPX reluctant to fault Bergoglio, quick to attack Pope Benedict

8 Comments

By Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I cannot be silent at the diabolic attack made against the Vicar of Jesus Christ by FSSPX.NEWS the official news outlet of the Society of Saint Pius X, founded by Archbishop Marcel-François Lefebvre, C.S.Sp. (1905 – 1991).

Little has been published about the heresies and blasphemies and idolatries of Bergoglio, the anti-pope par excellence. But within a week of the publication of a book defending priestly celibacy against Bergoglio’s fiendish plan to destroy it, there is the SSPX quick on the attack, like hounds.

You can read their absurd critique here. To say their argument is strained or in search of evidence to prove its a priori accusations, would be an accurate assessment. Let us take a look at the errors in this article:

A GRAVE DEVIATION?

The author of the article begins by attacking Pope Benedict’s declared intention of explaining the priesthood apart from the “methodological defect in the reception of Scripture as the Word of God.” Evidently the author here shows his complete ignorance of historical theology. The term “word of God” was never in the entire history of the Church prior to the 1260’s applied to Sacred Scripture. For Christians before 1260, the Word of God was only one: Jesus Christ. It was at the University of Paris that an analogy was made, based on phrases in the Old Testament which refer to revelations made to the prophets as, “the word of the Lord”, between Sacred Scripture as revealed truth and Jesus Christ as the Truth revealing.

This attribution by the Scholastics was innocent at first, but with time it became divorced from the concept of analogy and with the Reformation it became not “the word of God”, but “The Word of God”, replacing the Mass and the Most Blessed Sacrament with the Bible as the new medium of union with God, under the control of the expert layman, who dictated what Scripture meant, without reference to the Tradition of the Church.

This, since the time of the Reformation, has become indeed a grave theological and methodological error in interpreting Christianity or Sacred Scripture. And thus to fault Pope Benedict XVI for this approach is to adhere to the very errors of Luther and Bergoglio, who just made Scripture Sunday a new day of cult in his Church, with the placement of the Scriptures on the central axis of the nave of Churches, where the Eucharist and the Tabernacle had pride of place before the Council.

A FLAWED EXEGESIS

The next chapter bears a critical title, but the text does not display any substantive disagreement.

Granted that it is better to talk of offices than ministries, but it does not fundamentally alter a theological exposition which is non technical.

WORSHIP IN SPIRIT AND TRUTH

In this chapter, the author agrees, without making much of the praise due to the Holy Father for his exposition. Remarkable, as his affirmations here cut directly against the notion of the priesthood promoted during the Aggiornamento, of the priest as actor, guide and facilitator.

AN ERRONEOUS THEOLOGY?

In this chapter, the author attacks Pope Benedict for writing: “The crucifixion of Jesus is not in itself an act of worship.” And the author admits that the Pope is referring to the action of the Roman Soldiers. But nevertheless, the author goes on the attack and tries to draw the expression of the Pope over to a denial of Christ’s offering of His Passion as an act of worship. This is the absurd method of reading used by Sedevacantists. It is most unworthy of a Catholic priest or priestly society.

In truth, it is a historical fact, that the Roman Soldiers did not put Jesus Christ to death as an act of worship to the Emperor or any Roman or Greek god. Neither did the High Priests sacrifice Jesus as an act of worship of any God. So what the Pope says is perfectly correct. The pope is using “crucifixion” in its active sense, as the crucifying of Jesus, not as ‘the being crucified of Jesus.’  The one is an act of public execution, the other is the matter which Christ offered in the Holy Spirit to the Eternal Father for the Redemption of all. And I do not think you need a degree in theology to understand the difference. The former was objectively a sin, that of condemning the Just to death, the latter was a great act of Mercy, which merited the freedom from condemnation for all those destined to eternal death, who would receive His Sacrifice in faith.

When Archbishop Viganò exposed Bergoglio for covering for pedophiles, the Society was one of the last to speak on the issue. It has been seven years of continual heresies, scandals and blasphemies, but the Society rarely denounces publicly Bergoglio. Suffice it to say, that to publish such a flimsy and error-ridden attack within a week on Pope Benedict’s Book with Cardinal Sarah raises a lot of questions as to the real goals and agenda of a priestly society which still insists that all its priests offer their Masses una cum papa Francisco.

I won’t even mention that the Italian version of this released at Rome (see here) insults the Holy Father by calling him by his baptismal name at the end of the second paragraph of the essay. Nor will I mention, that which is no secret, that the big money behind the SSPX comes from Eastern Switzerland, the power base of the St. Gallen Mafia.