Tag Archives: The Remnant

News

Cardinal Burke urges Young People to die for the Latin Liturgy?

2 Comments

+ + +

Editor’s Note: Here we have arrived at the final step in the “Traditionalist psyop” started by the Skull and Bonesman, William F. Buckley, Jr. in concert with French Intelligence and with the British Intelligence Spy-Master‘s son, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. — Instead of solving the cause of the problem, they want youth to kill themselves like fanatics.

I would advise parents to keep their children away from the likes of Cardinal Burke and Michael Matt, and stop allowing them to attend the Pilgrimage to Chartres, because what these men are peddling has nothing to do with Christianity.

In Christianity, Christians are inspired by the Holy Spirit to believe in Jesus and remain faithful to Him until death. It has nothing formally to do with the language or liturgy in which these Christians worship Jesus, otherwise, we would have to hold that the Holy Spirit made a mistake on Pentecost, when at His Descent upon the Apostles and Disciples, he failed to inspire them to speak in the same language or in only certain languages, when the exact opposite is the truth. Thus, to say that the Traditional Latin Liturgy inspired the martyrs, is a sacrilegious verbal trick, which transfers the cause of holiness from Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit to the Latin Language or the liturgical texts compiled by the Church.

This is one of the fundamental errors, lies and heresies of Vatican II, in its document, Sacrosantum Concilium, n. 2, at its very beginning, which says (according to the Vatican.va English translation),

For the liturgy, “through which the work of our redemption is accomplished,” [1] most of all in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist, is the outstanding means whereby the faithful may express in their lives, and manifest to others, the mystery of Christ and the real nature of the true Church.

Now this statement is materially false, since the “work of our redemption” is accomplished

  1. Instrumentally by grace
  2. Fontally by Christ’s merits in His the Sacrifice of His Passion and Death
  3. Efficiently by the Holy Spirit actions in the soul
  4. Formally, by infused virtue

And this working of our redemption requires that we collaborate with humility and a spirit of penitence. It does not require that we be at Mass, or be praying in Latin. Indeed, in the history of the Martyrs and Saints, it is very rare to hear cases of spiritual events at Mass. This does not mean that the Liturgy cannot be an occasion for conversions, repentance, inspiration, expiation of sin and punishment, or for sanctification — indeed the worthy reception of the Sacraments is the ordinary instrumental means for the conferral of specific and fundamental graces and virtues, but there is a big difference between being an occasional or instrumental cause in specifics, and being the source of grace itself.

Thus, just as work is done by a carpenter both in his shop and on site, where requested or needed, so God can and does work grace during the Liturgy and apart from the liturgy. But no one in their right mind would say, that if you want your chair fixed, just leave it in the Carpenter’s shop since the shop itself will put it aright.

In sum, to God alone belongs all glory and honor, all praise and thanksgiving.

That is a dogma of the Faith, found in 30 verses of the Bible. — And in this expression, “alone” and “all” refer to the principality of the one Causing and the totality of the effects.

The liturgy is not our God, and we commit a horrible sacrilege and work of idolatry to attribute to it what belongs to God alone.

Thus to die for it is simply wrong. And to take God’s glory and attribute it to a form of liturgy is a sacrilege, a theft of something which is sacred and belongs to God.

Now, while it is true that God’s working of grace in our redemption is the highest form of liturgy, in the Greek sense of a largess of benefits, that is not what those who read the Vatican II document understand, since they identify this word with the liturgical rites of the Church on Earth.

+ + +

Michael Matt is the editor of The Remnant. He is a graduate of Christendom College, founded by Skull and Bonesmen and CIA agents. Matt has trained at a Police Academy, and may work as a policeman, since certain police agencies do not deny he works with them. Matt and his wife both have surnames which are used by Askenazim, and Matt claims a great-great grandfather who was a convert from Methodism, and who also has a Jewish surname. The Matt family after being told by their Catholic Bishops in Germany and Switzerland to stop printing “Catholic” newspapers without ecclesiastical permission, emigrated to the United States of America in the 19th century, and published their newspaper, The Wanderer in German, presenting themselves as German Catholics until recently. The Family had a disagreement after Vatican II, and Michael Matt’s father began The Remnant. Both newspapers have names used by Jews to speak of themselves in Exile. The Remnant was the first publication in the United States to feature the writings of “Chris Jackson”. Matt has never admitted the truth about the invalid abdication of Pope Benedict XVI, or the invalidity of the Conclaves of 2013 and 2025.

Cardinal Raymond Burke is the former Bishop of Madison, Wisconsin, who allowed a man who underwent surgery to become a woman to join a convent; he then was promoted to Archbishop of Saint Louis, Missouri; and then in as Judge (2006) and Prefect (2008) to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura at Rome. He participated as Cardinal Elector in the uncanonical Conclaves of 2013 and 2025, and was a notorious gaslighter of Catholics on the question of Pope Benedict XVI’s renunciation. He has participated in Masonic political alliances in Italy, and is famous for notorious exaggerations, such as “Everyone has the right to an annulment”, and for extraordinary acts of gaslighting, such as when he said in regard to Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation, “I think it would be difficult to say it’s not valid,” even while he privately affirmed the contrary.

Both Michael Matt, who has received multiple copies of all the evidence, and Cardinal Burke, who was personally sent a copy of the Letter to a Cardinal, know the proofs that the Conclave had no valid result, but have preferred to hide this from their followers and insist on communion with the uncanonically elected Leo XIV, even though, both of them have been informed and know, that Pope Nicholas II cursed such men as themselves for such a horrible sin of schism from Christ.

Each of these men, as well as everyone in the Traditional Pilgrimage to Saint Peter’s Basilica, last month, at Rome, demonstrate infallibly that the Traditional Latin Mass does NOT inspire men to martyrdom, because Martyrdom requires that you be in real communion with the Apostolic See, and if you don’t give a bleep about who is the real pope or what Papal Law on the elections of the Roman Pontiff require, you MOST CERTAINLY do not have the grace of martyrdom, though you might have the motivation of a fanatic willing to give up his life. — In the present climate, urging young people to give up their lives for ideologies is NOT what the Church needs right now. There is an elephant in the room, which first of all needs to be lead out and expelled.

Click the images above to see the original tweets. However, understand that Twitter might cancel these accounts or remove these tweets in the future, so the images are exact screen shots of what was visible at Rome, on Nov. 2, 2025, at 7:20 P. M., local time. — Click the names of persons to see articles about them at FromRome.Info or Wikipedia.

 

Media Criticism, News

Arbitrated Barnhardt discloses that “Chris Jackson” is a faker

9 Comments

+ + +

Catholic Media Critique by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

As a chronicler of events in the Church and in Catholic Media, I have published a series of articles, and with my colleague AJ Baalman, several videos, in which I have discussed the strange laypersons who populate Catholic Social Media discussions, their identities, positions, errors, and quirks.

So, tonight, we have arrived at a momentous point, where Ann Barnhardt, arbitrated for liability for fraud, constructive fraud, etc., to the tune of $100,000 USD in 2009, and living somewhere between Florence, Italy, and Denver, Colorado, has revealed that Chris Jackson is not Chris Jackson — as AJ and I have opined since the beginning of summer. For, she says in the post above that that is a “pen name”.

That means, for nearly 10 years, Catholic publications have deceived and defrauded their readers by publishing articles under a false name, while making it appear to be a true name, using even a photograph often of a journalist from the 1940’s. — This revelation raises serious questions about the ethics under which both The Remnant and One Peter Five have been run for 10 years** : questions that should not be dismissed or ignored if the integrity and reputation of all Catholic independent media is to be guarded.

Evidently, it was the repeated calls by AJ and myself, this summer, which sparked even the curiosity of Ann, who was recently interviewed by “Chris Jackson”‘s colleague, Stephen Kokx, lately of LifeSite News — but dismissed by the Board of Directors, it seems, under dubious circumstances.

I write all this because I believe Catholics have the right to know who is feeding them “the news” and what their personal histories are.

I have long supposed that “Chris Jackson” was not a real name, because the meaning of that name is, “the anointed of Jakob”, which has obvious Sabbatean/Jewish indications in that it implies that the Messiah is the Anointed of someone other than David. This entity is the founder of the “Neo-Sedevacantists“, and the website, Catholics4Trump.com. Their motto is, “Recognize and Withdraw”, which is basically a high-Anglican viewpoint. AJ and I think it is highly likely that C.K. is a MI6 operation to corral Catholics under Trump but separate from Rome, as Trump signaled with his picture of himself as Pope, early this year.

Ann Barnhardt is a self-described convert to the Catholic Faith, and former fornicator who lived in sin with a man for 10 years, according to her testimonies at her blog, “Judica me, Deus” (‘Judge me, o God!” — I kid you not), HERE. She became an international sensation, after leaving Cattle Future Trading, when she burned a Koran live on YouTube. Her former employer was a Jew, trading in futures on the Chicago Exchange, and her own expertise in Cattle Futures was cited by Bloomberg. I have written repeatedly about the thesis which her clear and rational arguments first clarified for the entire Church, the invalidity of the renunciation of the Papacy by Pope Benedict. See HERE. For that she deserves unabashed credit.

+ + +

And now you might understand why these folk consider me a faker and deceiver and a snake, for taking permanent vows to observe the Rule of Saint Francis, following Christ in poverty, chastity, and obedience, in consecration to the Immaculate Virgin, giving all my wealth to the poor, forsaking marriage, career, even family, nation, and friends. — I am not a Saint, but my name really is what I claim it to be, and I have never been fired by anyone at anytime, let alone found liable in a court of arbitration for fraud, while I am risking my entire reputation in defending Pope Benedict XVI’s dignity as Roman Pontiff and militating at Rome against the invalid conclaves of 2013 and 2015, not because I want to, but because Catholics have a right to know the truth and to reject antipopes, and I find it intolerable that no one is telling them the truth, nor taking real action to defend them from such fraudsters.

___________________

** And more recently on a daily basis by the former stand-up comedian and saxophonist, Frank Walker, of Canon212.com who is now being interviewed on occasion by Steve Bannon’s British colleague, Harwell, who headed his troubled and sacrilegious project to take over Trisulti Monastery, here, just outside of Rome, and turn it into a Judeo-Christian center for political activism. — Click on the link to Trisulti to see my Video visit of the Monastery and FromRome.Info’s 5 year coverage of the project.

Canon Law, Church History, Editorials

Siscoe: The Church can depose a heretical pope in Council

3 Comments

Commentary with a History of the Sutri Initiative by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Many Italian Catholics are followers of Andrea Cionci and think that he is outstanding for recommending that they appeal to the Cardinals for a new Conclave to elect a true Pope. As I explained in my critical review of his excellent book, “The Ratzinger Code”, which struck a powerful cord with Italians in Italy, since it was published in Italian, here, to elect another pope is something to be done after removing the heretical pope. Otherwise the Church would schism into two.

So my proposal in October 2023 to remove the heretical pope first, is actually the most Catholic thing to do. But I am not the first to say this. This was said by Robert Siscoe back on September 18, 2014, in the above linked article (Click Image).  Even Rorate Caeli called for a petition in the spring of last year, on May 2, 2024, to remove Pope Francis, though they did not say how this was to be done and even admitted they did not know. Evidently they do not know how to use Google to find the answer.

So Catholics in Italy should not think that the two most famous Italians criticizing Pope Francis, Andrea Cionci and Don Alessandro Minutella, pastor of Saint John Bosco Church, at Palermo, Sicily, are leading lights on this issue: neither chronologically nor canonically. Catholics from the U.S.A. are years a head of them.

Even the idea of petitioning Cardinals, was first launched by myself, using the nom du plum, Gaetano Romano, back in 2016 (see here).  So any idea, that I am opposed to petitions to the Cardinals per se, is simply not true.

The whole dialogue about removing a heretical pope disappeared in 2016, when Ann Barnhardt make her first video about the invalid renunciation of Pope Benedict XVI. My own role in that debate, which I joined in 2018, put that controversy to an end on January 30, 2023, with the juridically valid election of a new pope, according to Apostolic Right, which caused an explosion of hate and the most vile insults, calumnies and declarations from so many who sustained that other investigation, all of which were refuted in Italian here, including the calumnious ones of Andrea Cionci, here.

But, I waited patiently after that and prayed with Jesus Christ for His new Vicar. Only after clear signs of heretical depravity, did I propose the Sutri Initiative again on October 19, 2023.

Nor am I the first to suggest that the imperfect Council which has the authority to remove a heretical pope is the Provincial Council of Bishops in the Ecclesiastical Province of Rome.  This was first pointed out by the Ecclesiastical Historian from Poland, whose spoke about the First Council of Sutri, in 1046, back in August of 2018.  And I followed immediately with an article on  September 11, 2018, since I recognized immediately that this was the correct and historically verified way forward on this issue. Within days, the Remnant followed with its own article about the Council of Sutri, here.

I have stuck to the same opinion and proposed this long before Don Minutella could even explain canonically why the Renunciation of Pope Benedict XVI was invalid, or Cionci had even met me, and thus was spurred to begin his own investigations. I have stuck to the same position even though Robert Siscoe, the author of the top article, turned against those who understood that Pope Benedict XVI remained the true pope until death. I have stuck to the same opinion, even though the Remnant which talked about Sutri in 2018, keeps erasing comments which mention the Sutri Initiative for the last 18 months. I have stuck to the same position, even though Rorate Caeli refuses to say the word, “Sutri”.

Recently many are proposing an “imperfect council” to put Pope Francis on trial. But none speaks of Sutri any more nor speaks of the proper canonical way to do this, explaining the procedure and the canonical justifications for the manner of proceeding without violating the current norms of Canon Law. This is called the Sutri Initiative. — A provincial council at Rome is actually better than an “imperfect council” since it can be convoked in a juridically and canonically valid manner and need not have its acts approved by the Pope, since it is basically a quo warranto action, which is a form of formal communication of facts and testimonies, upon the validity of which alone the Council votes and judges.

And to all those who after 11 years won’t speak of what was spoken about 7 years ago, I can only ask, “Why now, after ‘Fiducia supplicans’ do you ALL insist on getting it wrong? “ Ask yourself whether that makes any other sense or serves any other purpose but keeping the Lavender Mafia in power?

So to all those who think that my apostolate “threatens” or “undermines” the apostolates of other, please be honest with yourselves and take a step back from your idolizing of men and start thinking about how the Church merits your love and your protection. You can go back to your YouTube channels after the problem is solved.

News

Morrison: Pope Francis signed ‘Fiducia supplicans’ to weaponize his hatred for the Catholic Faith

Editor’s Note: Here is another great psychological-ideological analysis of ‘Fiducia supplicans’, which leaves you without any guidance on how to personally react to the existential crisis in the Church caused by it.

This is standard “Recognize and Resist”, i. e. lament and do nothing, fake opposition.

When will the Remnant talk about the Sutri Initiative, which was published on October 19, 2023, two months before ‘Fiducia supplicans’ was published, and which enables Catholics in a valid canonical and juridical manner to do their part in curing the problem, by getting Pope Francis removed from office?

The Remnant needs to publicly take some side, for Bergoglio remaining in power, or against. Honesty in journalism does not remain silent about this, just like no man who knows his mother is being raped next door can satisfy himself with lamenting about the problem or describing it, without intervening at the risk of his own person, or at least calling the Police and asking for immediate intervention.

The Remnant began publishing in 1967, and to my knowledge has NEVER promoted a canonically valid petition to have Vatican II overturned or any errant pope removed from office. If I am wrong, I publicly ask to be corrected.

Here at FromRome.Info, I constantly offer practical ways for readers to respond to crises in the Church by action which addresses the problem. I do this so as not to rob them of the occasion of the grace of inspiration, hope, and good works, which the Holy Ghost always wills to inspired in souls. I hold that such a way of acting is true Catholic journalism in the cause of God, and I pray that Catholic journalists and influencers, one and all, come to see that this is essential to the ethical and moral responsibilities of their profession.

Editorials

Tosatti republishes Andrea Cionci’s “Benedict’s Plan B”

13 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

April 9, 2021 A. D: This morning, Marco Tosatti, one of the most senior Vaticanista here in Italy republished Andrea Cionci’s article on Benedict’s Plan B.  While this may not seem to be newsworthy, it merits nevertheless to be brought to the attention of the English speaking world, which has nearly no newspapers, electronic journals or TV channels who are willing even to speak about the incontrovertible anomalies in the reality of what Benedict XVI did and did not do.

Let Life Site News, The Remnant, National Catholic Register and Catholic Family news take note, and let their readers ask them why they are censoring the news.

Let 1 Peter 5, Dr. Taylor Marshall, Church Militant, EWTN et alia, take note of what Tosatti just did, and let their viewers and readers ask them why they are censoring the news.

In this manner, all these groups, knowingly or not, willingly or not, have been coopted into the narrative control of the Globalist Reset, wherein Bergoglio is the new Messiah and Benedict has betrayed humanity.

All these by remaining silent are running cover for the Bishops in the English speaking world who cling to Bergoglio as the sine qua non of the New Normal.  As a consequence, they make all the lies, frauds, crimes, heresies, apostasies and treacheries of Bergoglio possible. If they protest Bergoglio, it is like the man who protests the Scamdemic while wearing a mask and insisting on the vaccine.

Let them and their readers, followers and viewers meditate on that. In the mean time, they can read Cionci in English at FromRome.Info.

On the contrary, Marco Tosatti has the integrity to allow the facts present themselves and the discussions be aired. That does not mean he agrees with them 100%, but it does show that he is not controlled by globalists.

I publicly call on the media in the English speaking world of Catholics to do the same. It is time to stop calling FromRome.Info “unreliable”. After all projection as a psychological trick, is the tactic of Marxists.

___________

CREDITS: The featured image above is a screenshot of Tosatt’s official blog. Click here to read it in Italian.

Editorials, Faith, News

Francis is Presenting Mercy as a justification for breaking the law of Christ

1 Comment

There is an excellent, and detailed analysis, of the Pope’s Sunday Homily to the College of Cardinals, by Megaera Erinyes at the Remnant, which begins thus:

 

Monday, February 16, 2015

Papal Signaling: Pope Francis and the False Dichotomy

A Thumbs-Up for Cardinal Dolan
A Thumbs-Up for Cardinal Dolan, expresses the levity of the current Pontificate

Pope Francis’ homily for the latest consistory of cardinals meeting in Rome this week is being called a re-statement of his programme for his pontificate. Fr. Thomas Rosica, his English language spokesman, wrote on Twitter: “More than anything I’ve heard from (the pope) today’s homily is his mission statement.”

Let us assume for a moment that the pope knows the implications of what he is saying, and that the people closest to him are telling the truth when they say, repeatedly, that the things that are happening are happening at his behest, and examine what this “mission statement” has to say to the Church.

Francis is clearly signaling, again, his intentions for the Synod and the future envisioned at it by the Kasper faction. The question of Communion for the divorced and remarried is never named, but the terms describing the issue are unmistakable. And they are wholly on the side of the Kasperites, adhering without an iota of divergence from the basic presumption in Kasper’s proposal: that the law of God must be overturned or ignored for the sake of extending the mercy of God. A contradiction that is totally incompatible with all of Catholic theology, with logic and natural reason.

What I hope to offer here is not a detailed theological analysis, but merely a point-by-point clarification, given the context of what the pope means. It can only be described as a volley in an ideological war currently being waged at the highest levels for supremacy in the Church. I will go through the text of the consistory homily and try to add some clarification for those who might be in the position now of trying to explain what some of us see as the grave danger being posed by this pope.

(Continue reading, from the Original)