News

Jesus Christ would condemn Bergoglians as He condemned the Pharasees

10 Comments

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The anti-papacy of Bergoglio is truly a punishment for the wicked. But it is not so obvious that it is also a punishment for the Pharisee.

The Pharisees were a party of Jews, in the days of Christ Jesus, who exalted minor observances, based on human traditions, over the keeping of the Law which was revealed by God.

Some examples of their hypocrisy were listed by Jesus Himself:

  • that they refused to give medical care to human beings on the Sabbath, but counsels farmers to exert themselves to save a donkey if it fell into a well.
  • that they refused all actions necessary to avoid starvation, on the Sabbath, if any of them involved harvesting.
  • that they wore oversized Phylacteries and long tassels, so that everyone could see that they were observant and well to do.
  • that they scrupulously washed their hands before eating, but refused water and towels to those whom they invited to dinner, whom they did not like, so as to be able to condemn them in their hearts as unobservant.
  • that they urged the stoning of women caught in adultery, but did not condemn the man so caught or the men who watched the act for impure pleasure.
  • that they misused frivolously the Mosaic dispensation for divorce, creating all kinds of light reasons to dump their wives.
  • That they studiously avoided touching the unclean — a rule only for Sabbath observance — so much that they would leave a beaten, dying Samaritan alongside the road rather than draw near to him to help him.
  • They paid tithes on mint and rue, but did not love the Lord their God with their whole heart and strength and soul.

Today, however, those who know that Benedict XVI did not fulfill Canon 332 which requires, that if he is to resign, that he resign the papal munus, not the ministerium, BUT continue to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in communion with Bergoglio who never was nor can be the Pope on account of his manifest heresy, WHILE insisting that they are righteous because they go to Mass (in schism) every Sunday and receive the Sacraments (in Schism) regularly — these are no less Pharisees.

They are no less Pharisees because they neglect the more important things of the Catholic religion (staying out of schism, remaining in communion with the true Pope, obeying the letter of Canon Law) and exalt minor things to first importance (such as agreeing with superiors, following Cardinals, believing journalists and going to Mass on Sundays and Feasts etc.).

They insist that the first rule of the faith is going to Mass on Sunday or in receiving Communion BUT they relegate to no importance whatsoever the duty we have first to be in communion with God and the true Pope.  They ignore the Vicar of Christ, Boniface VIII  who said in the bull Unam Sanctam  that it is absolutely impossible to be saved without submission to the true Pontiff — and not simply to the idea of a true pontiff or the idea of the Papal office.

To these, then, I think it is theologically very sound to address the words of Our Lord in the twenty third chapter of Matthew, where He condemns the Pharisees:

Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you are like to whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear to men beautiful, but within are full of dead men’s bones, and of all filthiness. So you also outwardly indeed appear to men just; but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; that build the sepulchres of the prophets, and adorn the monuments of the just, And say: If we had been in the days of our Fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore you are witnesses against yourselves, that you are the sons of them that killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. You serpents, generation of vipers, how will you flee from the judgment of hell?

With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

10 thoughts on “Jesus Christ would condemn Bergoglians as He condemned the Pharasees”

  1. This is what the good Fr Leonardi Castellani had to say about the Pharisees in the introduction to his book (he doesn’t hesitate to label phariseism as the sin against the Holy Ghost because of its eminently spiritual nature), “Cristo y los Fariseos” (followed by my translation), “El fariseísmo es el mal más grande que existe sobre la tierra. No habría comunismo en el mundo si no hubiese fariseísmo en la religión; de acuerdo a lo que dijo San Pablo, ‘Oportet haereses esse…’ Y al final será peor. En los últimos tiempos el fariseísmo triunfante exigirá para su remedio la conflagración total del universo y el descenso en persona del Hijo del Hombre, después de haber devorado insaciablemente innúmeras vidas de hombre.”
    –
    “Phariseism is the greatest evil that exists upon the earth. There wouldn’t exist communism in the world if there weren’t phariseism in religion, according to the words of St Paul, ‘Oportet haereses esse…’ And at the end it will be worse. In the latter times the victorious phariseism will demand for its remedy the total conflagration of the universe and the bodily descent of the Son of Man, after having insatiably devoured countless number of men.”

  2. Dear Br. Bugnolo, I am confused by this essay. I know that Bergoglio is not the Pope because he is a manifest heretic who also despises orthodox Catholics and is trying to wreck the Church. In addition, I think you and Ann Barnhardt are correct” Benedict did not resign the papacy correctly, and, therefore remains the real Pope. Are you arguing that people like me should stop going to Mass? I attend an N.O. Mass every Sunday. What are you advising people like me, who believe Benedict still is Pope, do vis-a-vis Sunday Mass?

    1. No Catholic in his right mind ever attended the Mass of a schismatic. I am not asking you to stop attending a Catholic Mass, which must always be in communion with the true Pope. I am telling you that the Mass you are attending is not Catholic.

  3. Re: Our Supreme Pontiff, His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI. 9 September 2021 Dear Brother Alexis: Your website fromrome.info gives great hope and inspiration to many, including myself. I look forward to your insights and guest contributors. Thank you for your love and service to Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and His Holy Church. You are a powerful voice of ‘the remnant.’ I wish to address our desire for the restoration of Pope Benedict to the Chair of Peter in the physical sense. Spiritually he never left, physically he did leave. He is the Vicar of Christ and it is obvious that he is in constant communication with Our Lord Christ Jesus, Who is directing him. This fact is a great comfort to all members in the Church Militant. It is an unmistakable fact that our Holy Father must complete his pontificate in residence, in the Papal apartments. We pray for the courage and all the graces necessary for our Pope to accomplish this office. It is a certainty that in doing so that he goes to his martyrdom as prophesied by St. Pius X and St. Jacinta. I am also of the opinion that he is holding back until his appointed successor by Christ Jesus is known to him. As the last Patriarch Saint Joseph had to die before the Messianic reign could begin, so too Pope Benedict must die before the Eucharistic Reign can begin. Judaism was completed in Christianity, Christianity is completed in Holy Eucharistic. As the Man Jesus Christ carried His Cross to Calvary, and from the Cross, gave His Divinity ‘Christ’ into the hands of His Father, it was the New Man, the New Creation Christ Jesus Who rose from the dead. The old man Jesus Christ was no more, the New Man Christ Jesus arose and is the fulfilment of Holy Eucharist. Saint Paul confirms Eucharistic Man: “…may we in all things grow up in Him, Who is the Head (Ep 4:15), walk in newness of life, in the likeness of His resurrection (Rm 6:4,5), to perfect man, to the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ” (Ep 4:13). This is the arrival of Eucharistic man, and it is Eucharistic man one in Christ Jesus who brings to completion the desire of God: “Let us make man to Our image and likeness…And God created man to His Own image: to the image of God He created him, male and female He created them” (Gn 1:26,27). God made man in the beginning to His image (not likeness), in Christ Jesus man is made to God’s likeness too. Jesus said: “My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me, that I may perfect His work” (Jn 4:34). Through Holy Eucharist, Eucharist man is that perfection of His work. Our Blessed Mother in Her Apparitions and locutions tells us that “Less and less importance is being given to the Eucharist,” why? It is through Holy Eucharist that Eucharistic man becomes the new creature: “If then any be in Christ a new creature, the old things are passed away. Behold all things are made new” (2 Co 5:17). Eucharistic man inflicts the final defeat of Satan and puts hin in Hell for all eternity. Pope Benedict XVI knows that his successor is Petrus Romanus. Saint Malachy says of him in the only commentary of any of the popes foretold: “In the final persecution of the S.R.E. (Latin initials for Holy Roman Church), there will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock among many tribulations; after which the seven hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people” (Prophecies of St. Malachy, p. 96 by Peter Bander). At the present time The False Prophet Bergoglio occupies the Vatican offices and is poisoning the flock. Unfortunately, the majority of so-called Roman Catholics believe and trust Bergoglio, nevertheless “…what saith the Divine answer to him? I have left me seven thousand men that have not bowed their knees to Baal. Even so then, at this present time also, there is a remnant saved according to the election of grace” (Rm 11:4,5). I keep referring to Bergoglio as The False Prophet. Saint Paul said: “I wonder that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another gospel, which is not another: only there are some that trouble you and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But
    though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Ga 1:6-8,11). It is obvious that Bergoglio is the angel from heaven, (a bishop denying his duties), preaching a gospel besides that which has been preached to us by Jesus and the Apostles, so with absolute certitude we can say that Bergoglio is ‘anathema’. This then brings us to the question of who is Petrus Romanus? Notice the change in the description of the previous popes to the revelation of Petrus Romanus – “In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church…” Saint Paul quoting Habbacuk says: “Behold, ye despisers, and wonder and perish: for I work a work in your days, a work which you will not believe, if any man shall tell it to you” (Ac 13:41). Petrus Romanus will not be conclave elected! Why? At the present time the majority of cardinals are supporters of Bergoglio and his anti-Catholic program. They are homosexuals or turn a blind eye to it, the majority are Freemasons, so that St. John in the Apocalypse calls Vatican City: “…the great city which is called spiritually, Sodom and Egypt where their Lord also was crucified” (Apoc 11:8). Holy Eucharist is not necessary or wanted in their agenda, and the other six Sacraments are even of less important to them. Therefore it is necessary that they be excommunicated from the affairs of the True Church: “For it is impossible for those who were once illuminated, have tasted also the heavenly gift and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, have moreover tasted the good word of God and the powers of the world to come, and are fallen away to be renewed again to penance, crucifying again to themselves the Son of God and making him a mockery” (Hb 6:4-6). Obviously a conclave in which they might be included would vomit up another ‘Bergoglio.’ I firmly believe that Petrus Romanus will usher in the new era, which is The Eucharistic Reign of Christ on earth. Jesus said: “Behold, I make all things new” (Apoc 21:5), and ‘all things’ means ‘all things,’ including our Holy Roman Church to Holy Eucharistic Church. “As in Adam all die, so also in Christ all shall be made alive” (1Co 15:22) ‘…shall be made alive’ through and in Holy Eucharist. Pope Benedict is waiting for God to point out Petrus Romanus. I believe that he will be the complete Eucharistic man. I also believe that he will be in possession of the Ark of the Covenant which Holy Scripture states is in Mount Nebo, Jordan. It is through the Divine Mercy of God that this sacred artifact will be recovered as recorded: “…The place shall be unknown, till God gather together the congregation of the people, and receive them to mercy. And then the Lord will show these things, and the majesty of the Lord shall appear…” (2M 2:7,8). Shortly after these events I expect ‘the warning’ as told to Conchita at Garabandal, followed by the Miracle. Next would be the appearance of the two faithful witnesses, Enoch and Elijah, and we all know what follows. Brother Alexis, this is as I see the present situation, with all prayers and support for the Supreme Pontiff, His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI. God bless you in all you do. Fr a

    1. I agree with your analysis, Father. And thank you for your kind words. I think Bl. Taigi said that in a moment of Crisis, Sts. Peter and Paul will appear and point out to the Church of Rome the man to be elected Peter’s Successor. I think this refers to Petrus Romanus, if there is anything credible in the prophecy of St. Malachy, the provenance of which document is still in much doubt.

  4. Brother Alexis, based on your answer to utahagen: if a N.O. Mass is being said by a priest that mentions Pope Benedict in the canon, that mass is is a valid OHCA mass?

    1. Do not use “valid” in conjunction with “Mass”, because that is the incorrect term. A Sacrament is valid or invalid, depending upon whether it exits. A Mass is effective or ineffective in accord with whether the offering of the Most Propitious Sacrifice is acceptable to God, which only occurs when the Sacrament is valid and the priest is in communion with the true Pope. Then there is licit and illicit. A Licit Mass is said in accord with Church law, and illicit one lacks some legal right or violates some legal right of another. A Mass said under the circumstances you cite is presumed valid, licit and effective omnibus stantibus, that is on the supposition that the New Rite is offered in a worthy manner and without intention to offend and that God accepts it on account of the Church tolerating it.

      1. Thank you. Brother Alexis.
        So with that explanation which makes sense to me, we (I) should first find a priest that is in communion with Pope Benedict XVI to attend the Masses he celebrates, or avoid any mass where the priest explicitly names Francis in the Cannon.

        As a separate question, what happens if the priest just says “Our Pope” but does not says Francis or Benedict.

        I was watching one mass over the internet a few weeks ago and normally the priests says Francis name during the canon but on this particular day, this one priest just said “Our Pope” and “Our Bishop” without saying either ones names. It sounded strange to me. It was after Bergolio did proclaimed the Latin Mass restrictions, so I thought that might have been the reason this priest was letting people know that he was in communion with Pope Benedict. What do you think of a situation like that? The next time I watched the mass from that church, there was another priest celebrating and he used Francis name and his bishop’s name in the canon.

        I do not know if not mentioning the name of the Pope would make the mass illicit as being in error for not following the format of the established rite (wording).

      2. If you do not know the priest and arrive in a Church where this is done, you can presume he is doing it to say he is with Benedict XVI, but if you know the priest, in private you should ask him, promising him at the same time not to let other priests know.

Comments are closed.