The god of the Club

The “chapel” of the Palazzo Roffia, Florence, set up for a Masonic Ritual

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

As Catholics round the world write their Bishops and priests in regard to the failed renunciation of Pope Benedict XVI, it is becoming increasingly obvious that there is a crisis much more grave than pedophilia or homosexuality in the Catholic Clergy.

Time after time, Catholics are sharing with me the bizzare and even incoherent responses they are receiving from members of the clergy: arguments which range from sheer infantile petulance at loosing one’s rattle to absolutely diabolic attacks on God.

Underlying them all is a constant theme.  The ecclesiastical club is the arbiter of truth, not God, not Christ, nor Canon Law, not the philosophy of Aquinas or Aristotle, not reason, not facts, not history, and especially not words.

As an Anthropologist, I would sum up the responses as evidences of faith in the god of the club: the concept that one should do everything to keep the club of the clergy afloat (in whatever decisions it makes for itself), no matter what you have to deny or what you have to affirm.

Not being a youngster, I have personal experience with members of the club over 40 years. This mentality is not accidental, it did not infiltrate into the Church. It was cultivated, invited and required. If young men believed in absolute, eternal unchanging divine truth, they simply were either not accepted into the club, or they were progressively harassed and attacked and destroyed or driven out. The club works this way, whether they worship in Latin or the vernacular.

I know priests who were kicked out of their diocese simply because they preached that abortion was evil. I know priests who were kicked out of their Traditional Latin Mass society simply because they hung a curtain in the confessional. I could go on and on about cases of absurdity. To punish priests for absurdly unjust reasons became a hallmark of the post Vatican II era.

Hundreds of new communities and societies were founded. But a vast majority had a single unifying principle: abnormality. I mean ab-norm-ality: that is, a society not founded around the observance of God’s Law (nomos in Greek) but around some other human law: whether the will of the superior, the will of the bishop, the will of the founders: whether or not that will conformed itself to God or to Church teaching or not. Violate the “will” and you are out. Defend the Will of God against the “will” and you are out. It did not matter whether you were expelled for stealing or for kneeling at communion, both were equally grave.

The end result is that well over 60% of the clergy today simply do not worship Jesus Christ in practice. They worship the god of the club.

The problem with this moral error, over and above that it is explicitly demonic and idolatrous, is that when you accept as Head of your club a freemason or satanist, then your club has no problems at all with that.

The silence of the rest of the clergy, is thus, perhaps not so much a sign of disagreement, as many of us hope.

A priest who is silent must be questioned. I think you have the right to eternal salvation, and that you have the right to know which god your local priest worships.

And a discussion about the invalid resignation of Pope Benedict XVI is proving to be the best revealer of which god your priest worships. It is absolutely stunning to see the responses of clergy on this topic. The truth frightens them. Literally.

I myself saw that yesterday, when, after asking to meeting with the Head of an important section of the Roman Curia, I saw the head run down the stairs to avoid being seen by me. I guess having read my scholastic question on the Renunciation, a copy of which I mailed to him a few weeks ago, he chose flight over dialogue.

(Credits: The Palazzo Roffia is a Masonic Lodge, the image is from wikipedia,_galleria_00.JPG: Notice how much it looks like a “Catholic chapel”)


With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

10 thoughts on “The god of the Club”

  1. Very good. It may be because the clergy can longer perceive truth. The have lost their ability to understand.

    Recently, at daily Mass was the Gospel about peace and the sword. “”Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” —Matthew 10:34.

    The priest who is around 75 years old said he didn’t like this Gospel and never understood what it meant so he said he would preach on something else. This priest is very much a “love and mercy” guy and a strong supporter of Pope Francis.

  2. This post exhibits the truth that anyone who wants to follow God’s Will is destined to come to loggerheads with the false church which is now aping the True Faith. It is the reason the bishops of the United States are so hapless. It is the reason that the schism, which we are already in, will result in the True Church going underground and the false church, that Padre Pio predicted would come, will inhabit the buildings and maintain the trappings fo Catholicism. Each priest, bishop, and pope will have to decide who he is serving: God or His mimics. Every Catholic will have to face up to this choice too. Pray for souls and pray for one’s own soul that we may not be found wanting.

  3. Only a handful of Ecclesiasts accept that Jorge Mario Bergoglio Sívori is not the true and universal shepherd. Jesus Christ told us how we must not follow a pope that was not duly or canonically elected. Woe to the clergy today!!

    “…anyone who does not enter the sheep pen by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a robber. The one who enters by the gate is the shepherd of the sheep. The gatekeeper opens the gate for him, and the sheep listen to his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has brought out all his own, he goes on ahead of them, and his sheep follow him because they know his voice. But they will never follow a stranger; in fact, they will run away from him because they do not recognize a stranger’s voice.” Jesus used this figure of speech, but the Pharisees did not understand what he was telling them.” (John 10, 1 – 6)

    1. Em S: This passage from Saint John’s Gospel is quoted by the Fathers of the Church in regard to the AntiChrist, but it is also applicable to false shepherds of any kind, whether heretics or schismatics.

  4. The Freemason Chapel is frightening and I think the perfect illustrative analogy; the true priest serving God may be imitated in appearance also by the priests belonging to the club. Frighteningly so but distinct in to whom they pay homage and serve.

Comments are closed.